The problem is that 71.3% of what passes as peer reviewed climate science is simply junk science, as false as the percentage cited in this sentence. [ Willis Eschenbach ]That reminds me of this graph:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2945d/2945df1599e89478095662404e4762ea12f6d672" alt=""
Steve in Madison, WI and Ann in Los Angeles, CA
The problem is that 71.3% of what passes as peer reviewed climate science is simply junk science, as false as the percentage cited in this sentence. [ Willis Eschenbach ]That reminds me of this graph:
Copyright (c) 2009 Saltzafrazz. All rights reserved. Design by Free CSS Templates Bloggerized by TeknoMobi Supported by Orcun .
0 comments:
Post a Comment